Fighting Words
Kent Greenawalt
* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf reinlesen.de sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt reinlesen.de von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.
Geisteswissenschaften, Kunst, Musik / Philosophie
Beschreibung
Should "hate speech" be made a criminal offense, or does the First Amendment oblige Americans to permit the use of epithets directed against a person's race, religion, ethnic origin, gender, or sexual preference? Does a campus speech code enhance or degrade democratic values? When the American flag is burned in protest, what rights of free speech are involved? In a lucid and balanced analysis of contemporary court cases dealing with these problems, as well as those of obscenity and workplace harassment, acclaimed First Amendment scholar Kent Greenawalt now addresses a broad general audience of readers interested in the most current free speech issues.
Kundenbewertungen
Harassment, Balancing test, Jehovah's Witnesses, Communitarianism, Provision (contracting), Defamation, Falsity, Injunction, Controversy, Breach of the peace, Obscenity, Legislation, Presumption, Crime, Flag desecration, Facial challenge, Miller v. California, Buckley v. Valeo, Provocation (legal), Involuntary servitude, Philosophy of law, Political dissent, Pornography, Nonviolence, Individual and group rights, Concurrence, Abuse of authority, Canadian Human Rights Act, Hate speech, Miller test, Negligence, Racism, Liberalism, Due Process Clause, Critical legal studies, Cease and desist, Epithet, Actus reus, Hustler Magazine v. Falwell, Prostitution, Distrust, Imminent lawless action, Only Words (book), Political correctness, Hate crime, Culpability, Andrea Dworkin, Equal opportunity, Judge, Memoirs v. Massachusetts, Areopagitica, Impediment (canon law), Attempt, Contempt of court, Freedom of speech, Criminal speech, Discrimination in education, Frisby v. Schultz, Racial segregation, Civil Rights Act of 1964, Freedom of speech in the United States, Common law, Intimidation, Censorship, Ordinary law, Liberal feminism, Hostile work environment, Judicial deference, Patently offensive, Constitutionality